The title "Building as a Stimulus for Movement" comes from Kent Bloomer and Charles Moore's "Body, Memory, and Architecture" (the chapter "Body Movement" is actually a contribution by Robert J. Yudell"). The chapter asserts that the movement of our bodies is affected by the animation of space, and thus the spaces we create, tend to embody our own natural rhythms of movement.
"The ebbs and flows, weights, rhythms, and surges that emanate from us are inherent in the body and its movements. Try to walk in a precise and even measures. Even if you succeed in doing so horizontally, as in a march, there will still be complex rhythmic events in the vertical dimension (the raising and lowering of the chest with breathing and the changes in the relative alignment of body weight), not to mention the internal rhythms of heart and pulse.
Given this rhythmic richness which we all possess, and the fact that patterns as mundane as pavement cracks and picket fences can elicit complex haptic responses, we might well wonder why any building cannot be as good as the next in generating a body response."
- Robert J. Yudell
Yudell goes on to criticize today's repertoire of movement, saying that our bodies are increasingly becoming immobilized. While automobile and transit technology have been able to connect places and open up vast landscapes of space we would have never thought of treading before, it is slowly turning us into what Yudell calls "frozen bodies". The idea of the procession and promenade of pilgrimage is diminishing, so in a sense, it could be argued that we don't appreciate our spaces as much as we used to. The end location is becoming much more important that the journey that we go through to reach such a location. In Topophillia, Yi-Fu Tuan talks about this end-location mindset:
"Walking purposefully from A to B is felt as leaving so many steps behind and as having much more ground ahead to cover. Change the environment by introducing band music and, objectively, one still marches from A to B with seeming deliberation. Subjectively, however, space and time have lost their directional thrust under the influence of rhythmic sound. Each step is no longer just another move along the narrow path to a destination; rather it is striding into open an undifferentiated space. The idea of a precisely located goal loses relevance."
- Yi-Fu Tuan
Pamplet Architecture's "Architecture as a Translation of Music" cites numerous examples of how musical rhythm can affect one's movement and awareness of space. Elizabeth Martin introduces the subject-matter, saying that while "architecture represents the art of design in space; music is the art of design in time." If one flattens the dimension of time, into a 2D surface (in the same way sheet music does), one could really play arround with different rhythmic patterns onto the surface. Mannerist Facades often compose their surfaces that way, using some kid of parts to serve as the metronome (datum) and other parts to play up these rhythmic changes. The Renaissance ideal of harmony gave way to freer and more imaginative rhythms. Giulio Romano (1499-1546), one of the first promoters of Mannerism, used the triglyphs on the facade of Palazzo Te in Mantua as the metronome element, where all the spacings are equal, while the intervals of the intercolumnination differed creating a rhythmic pattern on the facade. Looking closely to the image below, one could read the facade giving an ABABAC rhythm, and more specifically, if one imagines each triglyph forms a 1/16th note, one could read the columns forming a musical rhythm of 1/8th - 1/4th - 1/8th - 1/4th - 1/8th - 5/16th.
Le Corbusier's La Tourette covenant also uses this same play of rhythm in the architecture. Iannis Xenakis, Le Corbusier's right hand man and internationally well known 20th century composer, designed parts of the facade to correspond to some of his musical compositions. The seemingly irregular window mullion intervals of the lower levels, juxtaposed with the pompous window openings of the upper levels (which serves as a datum, or metronome, for the irregular mullions below), creates a phenomenological play of light and shadow in the interior. The rhythmic intervals of the La Tourette facade is alot more complex than that of Romano's Palazzo Te. This is mostly due to the fact that Xenakis bases his musical intervals on mathematical ideas like the golden section and fibonacci series (more on that when I blog on Xenakis work within the next few weeks).
The criticism presented in class was that the animation seemed to rigid, and unmusical. This animation lacks two very important aspects of music: layering and attitude. While the animation is a direct translation of rhythm written down on sheet music, audible music is seldom played with one layer of rhythm. Even the most mono-rhythmic music, you will find multiple layers within the rhythm to give it a more powerful output. The animation above is the equivalent of a guitar student, playing a rock riff acapella; you dont have the rest of the band (datum) to fully grasp the idea of the music.
This idea that Palazzo dei Conservatori is analogous to a modern drum rhythm is an interesting one. As classical music of that time is much more melodic based as opposed to rhythm based, it is worthwhile to find out if that analogy has any correspondence to the evolution of music in Europe around that time.